Tag Archive for: employment discrimination

Brian Rochel Presents CLE on Rethinking Title VII Litigation

/in ,

On February 6, 2026, Kitzer Rochel partner Brian Rochel presented at the North Carolina Advocates for Justice (NCAJ) 2026 Employment Law CLE, a full-day program bringing together plaintiff-side employment attorneys to discuss evolving doctrine and practical litigation strategy.

As part of the broader agenda, Brian co-presented with Sam Kramer on “Reimagining Title VII: Beyond McDonnell Douglas.” The session focused on how employment lawyers can more effectively litigate Title VII discrimination claims without treating the traditional burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green as a rigid formula.

While McDonnell Douglas remains an important evidentiary tool, the presentation emphasized that Title VII ultimately asks a straightforward question: whether an adverse employment action was motivated, at least in part, by a protected characteristic. Courts increasingly evaluate that question based on the totality of the evidence, particularly at the summary judgment stage under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 or analogous state rules.

Brian discussed practical strategies for positioning cases for summary judgment and trial, including highlighting direct evidence, leveraging comparator and statistical proof where appropriate, and exposing shifting or inconsistent employer explanations. The session encouraged advocates to present discrimination cases as cohesive, evidence-driven narratives rather than mechanical burden-shifting exercises.

The CLE program also included panels on whistleblower protections, wage theft litigation, mediation strategy, and emerging practice tools, reflecting the continued development of plaintiff-side employment advocacy nationwide.

The Threat to DEI Programs and Worker Protections: What Employees Need to Know

/in , ,

Attacks on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs have escalated, with some companies and lawmakers scaling back efforts to promote fair hiring and advancement. Recent government actions, including pressure from state attorneys general, raise concerns about workplace discrimination. However, federal and Minnesota laws still prohibit bias in employment, and rolling back DEI may actually increase legal risks for employers.

DEI Does Not Mean Hiring Unqualified Candidates

DEI programs do not require companies to hire unqualified applicants. Instead, they help ensure fair access to opportunities by addressing barriers that have historically excluded certain groups. These policies expand applicant pools, reduce bias in hiring, and foster inclusive workplaces—all while keeping merit and qualifications at the core of employment decisions. Misconceptions that DEI lowers standards misrepresent its purpose, which is to create a fair and competitive job market.

Workplace Discrimination Remains Illegal

Despite efforts to dismantle DEI, federal and Minnesota laws still prohibit workplace discrimination. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination based on race, sex, religion, and national origin. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) provide further protections. Minnesota’s Human Rights Act (MHRA) goes even further, banning discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, and more.

Ending DEI Could Be Evidence of Discrimination

Companies that eliminate DEI efforts may be increasing their legal exposure. The National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) recently explained why litigation risk increases as private employers abandon DEI efforts. Courts could view these rollbacks as:

  • A Recognition of Past Bias: If a company once acknowledged inequities and acted to fix them, removing DEI programs could signal a return to exclusionary practices.
  • A Sign of Hostility Toward Inclusion: Firing DEI officers or dissolving employee resource groups may suggest discriminatory intent.
  • A Basis for Disparate Impact Claims: If workplace diversity declines after DEI cuts, employees may have grounds for legal action.

Minnesota Employees Have Strong Protections

The MHRA ensures that eliminating DEI cannot justify discrimination in hiring, pay, or promotions. Employees facing workplace bias can file complaints with their employer, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), or the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Conclusion

DEI programs aim to create fair workplaces by ensuring qualified individuals aren’t excluded due to bias. As some employers back away from these commitments, workers should stay informed of their rights. Companies that retreat from DEI without safeguarding against discrimination may face legal challenges—and employees should know the law remains on their side. Contact us today if you have questions about DEI efforts, discrimination, or other human rights issues at your workplace.

Congress Passes New Critical Protections for Pregnant Workers

/in , ,

On December 22, 2022, the Senate passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Advocates for fair and equitable working conditions for pregnant workers have been fighting for passage of this Act over the past ten years and the bill is finally on its way to the White House after strong bipartisan support.

When a worker is pregnant, they may face difficult challenges at work. Oftentimes, they are asked to perform job duties that put their health and safety at risk; they may have their pay reduced or be required to take unpaid leave; or they could be terminated from their position because of their condition. These are all types of discrimination and retaliation the PWFA now prohibits.

The PWFA is intended to protect pregnant workers from experiencing this kind of treatment at a time when they need stability and security in their job the most.

If you are experiencing discrimination or retaliation on the basis of your pregnancy or other protected status, contact Kitzer Rochel. Our experienced employment law attorneys would be happy to discuss your case and understand your legal rights and options.