Blog Elements - Kitzer Rochel PLLP

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

All Three Kitzer Rochel Attorneys Present at the 2025 Upper Midwest Employment Law Institute

May 21, 2025/in Blog, Kitzer Rochel News

We are proud to share that all three of our attorneys—Brian Rochel, Frances Baillon, and Phillip Kitzer—were featured presenters at this year’s Upper Midwest Employment Law Institute (ELI), held May 19–20, 2025, at the Saint Paul RiverCentre. As one of the premier employment law conferences in the country, the ELI brings together top legal minds […]

Employment Protections in Minnesota: What Employees Need to Know in a Changing Landscape

February 22, 2025/in Blog, Employment

The Trump Administration has been direct in its efforts to combat decades-old nondiscrimination standards. But while its actions have created a lot of (justifiable) coverage and outrage, it is important to understand the vast majority of legal protections in employment remain untouched. Along with nationwide legal actions challenging the recent orders and changes, there are […]

All Three Kitzer Rochel Attorneys Present at the 2025 Upper Midwest Employment Law Institute

May 21, 2025/in Blog, Kitzer Rochel News

Employment Protections in Minnesota: What Employees Need to Know in a Changing Landscape

February 22, 2025/in Blog, Employment

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

All Three Kitzer Rochel Attorneys Present at the 2025 Upper Midwest Employment Law Institute

May 21, 2025/in Blog, Kitzer Rochel News

Phillip Kitzer: AI in Employment Litigation

Phillip Kitzer presented in a forward-looking session titled “Litigating Employment Cases When AI Is In Play – From Purchased AI Tools to AI-Drafted Decisions.” In collaboration with other experts in law and technology, Phillip explored how artificial intelligence is already influencing the workplace—and how it’s affecting litigation strategy. The panel covered AI tools used in hiring, evaluation, and decision-making processes, and addressed the challenges of litigating cases where AI plays a central role. Attendees gained critical guidance on discovery, evidence, and the novel legal questions raised by AI technologies.

Frances Baillon: Updates on Workplace Harassment Litigation

Frances Baillon was a member of a panel presenting on “Workplace Harassment Case Update 2025 – Title VII Cases”, delivering insights into recent developments under Title VII and emerging harassment litigation trends. This session broke down critical case law updates and examined how courts are interpreting hostile work environment and employer liability standards. Frances contributed her expertise in representing employees in complex harassment cases, providing actionable takeaways for practitioners adapting to evolving legal standards.

Brian Rochel: Litigating Retaliation Claims at Summary Judgment

Brian Rochel co-presented “Retaliation Claims at Summary Judgment – Winning Approaches to Discovery, Briefing, and Argument from Both Sides”, a practical session focused on one of the most dynamic and challenging areas of employment litigation. Brian shared his plaintiff-side strategies for navigating discovery, leveraging factual records, and constructing persuasive arguments at the summary judgment stage. The session offered a rare dual-perspective approach, with presenters from both sides of the bar discussing how to position retaliation claims for litigation success in an era of heightened scrutiny. Brian presented along with Kristin Berger Parker at Jones Day in Minneapolis.

This year’s Institute showcased Kitzer Rochel’s ongoing leadership in employment law, particularly in areas undergoing rapid transformation. Whether addressing the impact of AI, strengthening anti-retaliation advocacy, or navigating new harassment standards, our attorneys continue to bring clarity and depth to some of the field’s most pressing issues.

For more information on our work or to connect with any of our attorneys, contact us today.

Employment Protections in Minnesota: What Employees Need to Know in a Changing Landscape

February 22, 2025/in Blog, Employment

Along with nationwide legal actions challenging the recent orders and changes, there are still laws—especially in Minnesota—that protect workers.

Antidiscrimination Protection

Federal contractors have long been required to provide equal employment opportunity. A recent executive order removed that requirement and provided that the Department of Labor’s contract office would no longer promote diversity or affirmative action.

But this does not remove equal employment protection for employees—it only removes that particular requirement for companies to contract with the federal government. The protections in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) are not changed, and all employers in Minnesota must follow them. It is still unlawful to discriminate based on race, religion, disability, national origin, sex, marital status, familial status, age, sexual orientation, and gender identity in Minnesota.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Despite some shake-ups within the EEOC, including the dismissal of two of its three Democratic Commissioners, its essential work remains. The EEOC cannot currently issue new rules or policies, because it no longer has enough Commissioners to vote on them.

But you can still file an EEOC charge. Even if the EEOC does not pursue your case, you can still request a Notice of Right to Sue and pursue your claim in court. The same rights in Title VII and the MHRA still protect you, and are being enforced not only by the EEOC but also the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) and the courts. You can also file a charge with the MDHR if you have experienced discrimination for virtually the same reasons as with the EEOC.

LGBTQ+ Protection

LGBTQ+ rights are involved in the actions above as well as two other executive orders. The first order specifies that the United States only recognizes two sexes, and explains how its policies will define and apply “male” and “female.” It requires federal agencies and employees to use the approved terminology in all communications and remove any references to gender or gender identity. For example, any government form to be filled out must list sex as male or female, and cannot ask about a person’s gender identity or include any other options, such as non-binary. The second order is about transgender people participating in sports, and applies sex-based distinctions that disregard gender identity.

But these orders have been challenged in court for violating the U.S. Constitution, among other things. And states still have protections that exceed federal protections. Minnesota, in particular, has protections for LGBTQ+ people that remain unchanged by these orders, notably the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Minnesota’s Attorney General, Keith Ellison, has recently expressed that the executive order does not override the MHRA.

Even with the federal policy changes in civil rights protection and enforcement, Minnesota (among other states) has strong laws that still protect your rights. The MHRA is among the most protective laws in the country, and it is unchanged.

Conclusion

If you have questions about employment law in the wake of the Trump administration’s efforts to change legal norms, contact us today to learn more.

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Disclaimer